17

Apr

by Jeff

Seth Godin posted this with more of a “con­sumer pro­tec­tion” spin on it, but I think it’s fun­da­men­tal to mar­ket­ing as well, so I’m going to quote part of the post here, and then elab­o­rate on it a bit.  Here’s the excerpted quote, but you really ought to read the entire post:

Here’s one rea­son we mess up [big deci­sions about money]: Money is just a number.

Com­par­ing dreams of a great [car] stereo (four years of dri­ving long dis­tances, lis­ten­ing to great music!) com­pared with the daily reminder of our cheap­ness makes pick­ing the bet­ter stereo feel eas­ier. After all, we’re not giv­ing up any­thing but a number.

The col­lege case is even more clear. $200,000 is a num­ber that’s big, sure, but it doesn’t have much sub­stance. It’s not a num­ber we play with or encounter very often. The feel­ing about the story of com­pro­mise involv­ing some­thing tied up in our self-esteem, though, that feel­ing is some­thing we deal with daily.

Here’s how to undo the self-marketing. Stop using numbers.

You can have the stereo if you give up going to Star­bucks every work­day for the next year and a half. Worth it?

If you go to the free school, you can drive there in a brand new Mini con­vert­ible, and every sum­mer you can spend $25,000 on a top-of-the-line internship/experience, and you can cre­ate a jazz series and pay your favorite musi­cians to come to cam­pus to play for you and your fifty coolest friends, and you can have Her­bie Han­cock give you piano lessons and you can still have enough money left over to live with­out debt for a year after you grad­u­ate while you look for the per­fect gig…

Do you see the con­nec­tion with marketing?

Mak­ing num­bers, or more com­monly fea­tures, tan­gi­bly and com­pellingly real to the buyer is exactly what good copy­writ­ers are paid to do. And they do it the same way Seth does in that quote:

  • By con­vert­ing num­bers and fea­tures to human-scaled con­crete measures
  • By iden­ti­fy­ing the ben­e­fits that really mat­ter to the customer
  • By dra­ma­tiz­ing those same end ben­e­fits and cre­at­ing iden­ti­fi­able sce­nar­ios around them

Telling me that this light­weight lug­gage is X pounds lighter doesn’t do much for me.  It’s just a num­ber, uncon­nected to any­thing I might really care about.

Telling me that the saved weight equals the com­bined weight of an extra sport coat, shirt, and pair of dress pants, basi­cally an entire extra change of clothes with­out incur­ring any weight penal­ties, and I just might become inter­ested in the lug­gage for an upcom­ing extended trip.

Remem­ber, a num­ber, unless it’s a dollar-figure that’s going into my bank account, doesn’t directly address the all-important What’s In It For Me (WIIFM) ques­tion. But a vision of me enjoy­ing some tan­gi­ble ben­e­fit does.

That’s the obvi­ous part — the tac­ti­cal prac­ti­cal, must-do part.  So if you’re not con­vert­ing your fea­tures into “which means” ben­e­fit state­ments, and then con­vert­ing those ben­e­fits into dra­matic, visu­al­iz­able sce­nar­ios, then get on it… and start answer­ing WIIFM with load, clear, and vividly dra­ma­tized benefits.

And then, of course, there’s the more sub­tle part: talk­ing about what this or that fea­ture or char­ac­ter­is­tic means not in terms of imme­di­ate ben­e­fit, but in terms of self-identity and shared val­ues.  It’s a bit less practical-tactical, but per­fect for The­ory Thursday…

3

Apr

by Jeff

There’s a sim­ple axiom amongst direct response copy­writ­ers: “make it easy for the cus­tomer to say yes.”

Sounds like a “duh” piece of advice, but it’s amaz­ing how often this advice gets botched.  And it usu­ally get’s botched in one of two ways:

1) The copy doesn’t make it easy for the cus­tomer to real­ize WHAT she would be say­ing yes to.  

In other words, the site doesn’t clarify:

  • WHAT is being offered for sale,
  • WHEN or in what FORM the cus­tomer should expect the actual deliv­er­ables to arrive
  • WHY this is a good deal and bet­ter than the other options
  • HOW MUCH the offered prod­uct or ser­vice will cost

2) The copy doesn’t make it clear HOW to say yes and take that next step.

Now, don’t get me wrong: I’m a big fan of hav­ing dif­fer­ent con­ver­sion points for early, mid­dle, and late stage shop­pers (where appro­pri­ate), but  you shouldn’t let that get in the way of hav­ing a nice, clean, sim­ple Call to Action.  If prospec­tive cus­tomers have to decide between 14 options just to buy, you’re mak­ing them work too hard, and your sales will suf­fer accordingly.

You Might Be Mess­ing This Up If…

What’s really insid­i­ous about this par­tic­u­lar con­ver­sion flaw is that your mar­ket­ing and Web teams are unlikely to know about sim­ply because they’re suf­fer­ing under The Curse of Knowl­edge.  To them the offer seems per­fectly clear, and the dif­fer­ent options for buy­ing are  a bonus rather than a bur­den.  So even if you don’t think you suf­fer from this, you might want to check to see if:

  1. You have unusu­ally high bounce rates on your home page.
  2. Peo­ple are click­ing on your Calls to Action and then back­track­ing to “How it Works,” “FAQ,” and “About Us” pages — almost as if they’re look­ing one last time to see if they can’t find some answers.
  3. You have unusu­ally high exit rates from “How it Works,” Ser­vices, and Prod­uct pages
  4. Your cart or check­out aban­don­ment rates stay high despite a high-quality check-out process and repeated opti­miza­tion efforts aimed at this por­tion of your Website.

I’m not say­ing these issues are proof pos­i­tive that your mes­sag­ing and basic offers need work, just that the rep­re­sent a good rea­son to look into it.

How to Fix It

The best advice is to hire an out­side expert. I real­ize that sounds a bit self-serving, com­ing from a messaging-driven Web­site Opti­miza­tion pro­fes­sional, but, well, what can I say? It’s the sim­ple truth.

But if you’re try­ing a DIY approach, here’s what I recommend:

A) Try the “Here’s the Deal” Exercise.

Imag­ine that you’re at the bar with an acquain­tance who knows almost noth­ing about your prod­uct or ser­vice, but who would ben­e­fit from it, if only she under­stood a few things. If you were to turn to her and say, “so here’s the deal,” what sort of short and sweet pitch would you give to her that would get her ready to say yes or com­mit to learn­ing more in 120 sec­onds or less?

Also, make sure you don’t use jar­gon — remem­ber, this prospect isn’t an indus­try insider — dur­ing your “so here’s the deal” speech, and make sure the ben­e­fits are dra­ma­tized and compelling.

B) Try Using Schemas

I had Baba Ghanoush for the first time a few months ago, and when I asked what it was, a whole bunch of peo­ple started to explain it to me, with vary­ing degrees of suc­cess.  But then Bryan Eisen­berg — a con­su­mate mar­keter and my per­sonal Web­site Opti­miza­tion men­tor — nailed it when he said it was “egg­plant gua­camole.”  Boom. Sud­denly every­body got it.

Why?

Because Bryan invoked a schema we already rec­og­nized, gua­camole, and then mod­i­fied it with egg­plant. Isn’t that a much more ele­gant expla­na­tion than Wikipedia’s, “a Lev­an­tine dish of egg­plant (aubergine) mashed and mixed with vir­gin olive oil and var­i­ous seasonings”?

The same thing hap­pens with movies, too.  Accord­ing to Chip and Dan Heath, Speed was ini­tially pitched as “Die Hard on a Bus.”  Boom. You get it.  Aliens is a sci­ence fic­tion movie, but it’s noth­ing like Star Trek. Totally dif­fer­ent feel, right?  But if you say “Jaws in Space,” you instantly grasp both the con­cept and the feel of the movie.

So what schema could you use to describe your prod­uct or service?

Cau­tion — the schema you use can greatly impact the customer’s expec­ta­tion of value and price, so choose wisely.

C) Stream­line Your Call to Action and Con­ver­sion Process

Now, don’t get rid of your lead nur­tur­ing pro­gram or any­thing, but do con­sider whether you might nar­row down your offer­ings and options. Or at least con­sider mak­ing one option the “default” and most pro­moted option. And as with any piece of Web Opti­miza­tion advice, test it out. See what actu­ally con­verts the best. You might just be sur­prised at the results.

And that’s today’s Prac­ti­cal Tac­ti­cal Tues­day Tip :)

29

Mar

by Jeff

Do the HOME­work too!

When it comes to Adver­tis­ing, Mar­ket­ing, and Per­sua­sion, are you a stu­dent of what’s come before you?

  • Do you know the history?
  • Do you try to learn from the greats by read­ing their books and study­ing their works?
  • Do you look at all of it?  Or just a nar­row slice?

If you didn’t answer Yes to the main ques­tion and the first two bul­let points, you can stop read­ing now. Really. There’s no hope for you.

But I find that quite a few seri­ous copy­writ­ers get hung up on the third bul­let point.

These copy­writ­ers have stud­ied the direct mail lin­eage — Hop­kins, Caples, Col­lier, Schwartz, Hal­bert, Kennedy, et al — but haven’t looked at any of the giants of Madi­son Ave style adver­tis­ing beyond, maybe, Ogilvy.  And vice versa for broad­cast adver­tis­ing guys who’ve never stud­ied Direct Response marketing.

Or they’ve never thought that the The­atre Arts or Rhetoric or Com­edy Writ­ing or Sales Train­ing or even say, Comic Books had any­thing to teach them.

In other words, they dis­miss stuff that’s not directly in their field or that they don’t “get” right away. Big mistake.

So today’s les­son: be a stu­dent of the game — the whole game.  Learn what’s great from the past. Study it.  Note that “study” doesn’t mean pas­sively read­ing it. When in doubt, fig­ure out what other great tal­ents that you DO like see in the “greats” that you don’t get.

And here’s two great links to get you started on the path:

  1. This New York Times arti­cle on Ed McCabe [hat tip to The Escape Pod for turn­ing me onto this article]
  2. This Invis­i­ble Ink post on learn­ing from leg­ends you don’t “get” at first con­tact.

P.S. That NYT arti­cle men­tions the same Volvo ad I used as an exam­ple in my last The­ory Thurs­day post and I man­aged to snag a screen shot of it.  Here it is:

A bit of com­mon wis­dom for lawyers goes some­thing like:

When the law is against you, argue the facts. When the facts are against you, argue the law. When both are against you, call the other lawyer names”

Great advice, but how does this trans­late into adver­tis­ing terms?

Ah, to get that, you have to go back to the Rhetor­i­cal advice from which this com­mon wis­dom came. And when it comes to Rhetoric, I always look to Jay Hen­richs, author of Thank You for Argu­ing and Word Hero. Here’s what Jay has to say in chap­ter 12 of Thank You for Arguing:

If facts work in your favor, use them. If they don’t (or you don’t know them), then…

Rede­fine the terms instead. If that won’t work, accept your oppo­nents facts and terms but…

Argue that your opponent’s argu­ment is less impor­tant than it seems. And if even that isn’t to your advantage…

Claim the dis­cus­sion is irrel­e­vant.”

Redefin­ing Terms Read more

Trouble_girl3I’m re-publishing this post for Prac­ti­cal Tac­ti­cal Tues­day because I like it and because very lit­tle is more prac­ti­cal than “How To” advice on writ­ing bet­ter headlines.

Hope you enjoy:

My confession? Even though my copy always had great head­lines, my blog posts fre­quently didn’t.

I wasn’t (yet) struck by the need for trou­ble — and with­out a hint of taboo, or a chal­lenge to the norm, or a per­ceived con­flict, or at the very least a para­dox, most head­lines just never get off the ground.

Here’s why there has to be a sense of trou­ble liv­ing at the heart of your headline:

Your head­line needs to hook the reader into read­ing your “story,” and sto­ries are cre­ated by and live off of con­flict. In fact, another phrase for trou­ble is “story appeal.”

Your goal: entice the reader with a hint of con­flict, and then she “has” to click through so she can know how the con­flict is resolved and what kind of trans­for­ma­tion takes place as a result.

4 Ways to Cre­ate Con­flict in your Head­lines: Read more

If actions speak louder than words, how effec­tive can a TV ad be if its imagery con­tra­dicts its sales mes­sage?  Don’t think this hap­pens?  Check out this ad FedEx ran dur­ing the Super Bowl no less:

YouTube Preview Image

The mes­sage: You shouldn’t judge some­thing based on a name; FedEx ground is faster than you think

The imagery and action: You CAN judge things by their name and the only per­son who doesn’t ques­tion that is the only relat­able char­ac­ter in the entire ad.

And this sort of thing hap­pens all the time, usu­ally in the name of humor or enter­tain­ment, where the ad ends up with imagery and on-screen action that belies the sales message.

But here’s what it looks like when you do it right — when the imagery per­fectly aligns and strength­ens the sales message:

YouTube Preview Image

The mes­sage: Beni­hana turns an ordi­nary din­ner out into an EVENT

The imagery: Glam­ourous peo­ple flock­ing to Beni­hana to be delighted and thrilled and enter­tained by the kinetic chore­og­ra­phy that is a Japan­ese steak house.

Hey, if you’re going out for a spe­cial din­ner, why not make it an event?  Now that’s a near-perfect ad with absolutely per­fect imagery.